Skip to main content

Ra.One, Marketing and Madness

Is Shahrukh Khan (SRK) the greatest marketer in the film industry?
The air you've taken in you lungs before the release of the movie contains particles of Ra.One. Ra.One is on news channels, game shows, TV serials, bus hoardings, newspapers, and on top of it you have all shows at major theatres simply screening Ra.One. With the power of money, a promotional budget of 50 Crores, collusion with others in the industry, Ra.One has managed to create a madness - a monopoly. I also have a feeling that even the critics have been bought to put good reviews.
People don't have a choice. Is this what artists are meant to do? Is Shahrukh Khan the greatest artist we would like to remember? Or the greatest dictator of art Or the greatest monopolist of art Or simply a money making machine ? Is he the one promoting art or is he the one monopolizing art?
Businesses would like to remember Ra.One as the greatest promotional campaign in the history of movies. It spend a lot of money to make more (made profit after 3 days of release). It exploited the festive season, colluded with others in the entertainment industry and made people sing the tune of Ra.One. 
Ra.One has been promoted using what I'd like to call - Carpet Bombing. Carpet bombing is not effective. World War II was characterized by destruction of entire cities by the Allied and Axis forces by bombing them to ground. The problem is that it definitely killed the enemies (victory) but it also killed civilians who had nothing to do with the great war. Carpet Bombing promotional strategy used by team SRK in promoting Ra.One has also created a lot of anti-feeling against the movie. Subcultures of consumption are created by branding practices followed by companies. Intrusiveness is one aspect that simply puts off a lot of people. As a result there is a lot of anti-activity against the movie. By monopolizing the market Ra.One has taken away a lot of power i.e. power of choice from people. Powerless consumer will retaliate by boycotting. Ra.One's promotional strategy has created a hysteria about the movie - Simple Madness. Taking lines from Dark Knight - "madness, as you know, is like gravity. All it takes is a little push" . Dark Knight created a text book marketing campaign, which we study in our marketing courses.  A completely integrated marketing campaign but it did not rely on carpet bombing. Even Amir Khan movies, which I personally consider closer to a work of art than pure commercial ventures indulge in decent (not insane) promotional practices. They are something we can digest. 
On the contrary carpet bombing strategy used by SRK has resulted in the creation of a subculture that is boycotting the movie. Their word-of-mouth is expanding the number of people in this subculture and creating opposition brand loyalty against Brand SRK. In the long run this can be detrimental for the movie, brand SRK and propagation of art in particular.
Ra.One Marketing

Popular posts from this blog

Giving the finger to a scripted life!

It's crazy to take jobs just because they look good on your resume. That's like saving sex for your old age. ~ Warren Buffet. You have plans for your life, career etc. You've built an entire script but what is this based on? Scott at Ted talks about how almost 80% of the people around the world don't like the job they do. In his career, he found one day that most of the job he did was automated by his competitors. Building the resume was clearly not way forward. It was during that time he he heard the quote by warren buffet, " It's crazy to take jobs just because they look good on your resume. That's like saving sex for your old age ". This was when he left his job. While there are know universities, which talk about finding your passion, Scott talks about a lens that can help in finding the job we love.

Twitter and the world of hate - Delhi Gang Rape

Common wisdom says that venting out reduces frustration. Twitter, Facebook, and blogs help us achieve the same. While what normally starts as a "venting out" experience, I suspect is turning out to be an anguish enhancer. When I look at trending topics on twitter all what I see is a world of "Hate". Small pieces of hate messages turn out to be a big collective bunch of hate. Take the case of Delhi gang rape and some ill-minded comments of politicians and spiritual gurus. What started as scattered bickering remarks against a comment made by "Asaram" has now become a full fledged ball of rage. This rage was "non-directional", had no agenda and was oriented towards sarcasm and wit. While Delhi gang rape highlights poor governance, societal problems and problems of law and order, venting out on a forum that accumulates the frustration by many such people only adds to the low well-being. It is time we use some discretion and post messages that...

Twitter vs. News - Effectiveness in building relations

Social Media has been termed as an effective way to build relationships. Brands are trying to harness this capability by building social presence on this new media. Celebrities today account for the maximum amount of followers on the web with twitter being a fine example for this. But is this new media effective in creating relationships with this vast list of followers, which celebrities often tend to have? In an interesting research by Lee and Jang , they explore the effectiveness of celebrities in building social presence on new media. They compare twitter and a news website to check the relative effectiveness of enhancing social presence. While the traditional PR machinery used by celebrities might give them news coverage, they contend that their tweets can reduce the barrier of relational development as compared to a news website. Their findings are counter-intuitive and very interesting.