Skip to main content

Social Media, Consumer Behavior and Brand Loyalty

Marketers have failed to look at the impact of "advocates" on Social Media. Viral Campaigns are "NOT" the only revolutionary part of social media. We need to look again into the traditional funnel approach and its difference from the new funnel.


Social Media has impacted the consumer purchase process in a big way. The traditional consumer buying process included information search, consideration of brands (many brands), evaluation of brands (Few brands) and final choice. It is also popularly called as the "funnel" model, where the consumer searches for a variety of brands and makes a consideration set depending on his or her needs. These lead to the final choice of brand after evaluation of alternatives. The problem with the funnel approach is that it no longer holds good, especially with majority of consumers of a brand spending time on social media. Marketers have failed to realize this. Moreover since Social Media is the buzz word today, many marketers are using it just for heck of it. This is resulting in many people questioning the effectiveness of social media for businesses.

Social Media does not mean Viral Campaigns

Viral Campaigns are "NOT" the only revolutionary part of social media, but somehow due to its glamorous nature, the word "Viral" has dominated the marketer's landscape of social media. The probability of success of a viral campaign is low since a consumer's time on social media is limited. If one campaign goes viral, it does not mean a thousand others will also go viral. P&G's success in their old spice campaign is not because of a great campaign, but because of the news surrounding their increase in expenditure on social media.

The NEW Consumer Decision Making Process and Advocacy


The new consumer decision process has changed and the traditional funnel model is no longer valid. The "Funnel" has changed. Today a loyal consumer has the power of "Advocacy". The consumer actively talks and listens to other loyal consumers and moves back and forth the funnel. So after forming a consideration set, the consumer "listens" to the loyal advocate of the brand. It may change the consideration set of the consumer and narrow him or her to one or two brands. These advocates direct the undecided consumer through the funnel to the point of purchase. Finally the effectiveness of the sales person decides the choice of brand. A brand loyal consumer eventually turns into an advocate and this process goes on. Marketers have to focus on existing advocates because they are the ones who can create the "ripple effect" on social media. This ripple is not a "viral" campaign but a ripple of first time buyers turning into loyal consumers.

Popular posts from this blog

Giving the finger to a scripted life!

It's crazy to take jobs just because they look good on your resume. That's like saving sex for your old age. ~ Warren Buffet. You have plans for your life, career etc. You've built an entire script but what is this based on? Scott at Ted talks about how almost 80% of the people around the world don't like the job they do. In his career, he found one day that most of the job he did was automated by his competitors. Building the resume was clearly not way forward. It was during that time he he heard the quote by warren buffet, " It's crazy to take jobs just because they look good on your resume. That's like saving sex for your old age ". This was when he left his job. While there are know universities, which talk about finding your passion, Scott talks about a lens that can help in finding the job we love.

Twitter and the world of hate - Delhi Gang Rape

Common wisdom says that venting out reduces frustration. Twitter, Facebook, and blogs help us achieve the same. While what normally starts as a "venting out" experience, I suspect is turning out to be an anguish enhancer. When I look at trending topics on twitter all what I see is a world of "Hate". Small pieces of hate messages turn out to be a big collective bunch of hate. Take the case of Delhi gang rape and some ill-minded comments of politicians and spiritual gurus. What started as scattered bickering remarks against a comment made by "Asaram" has now become a full fledged ball of rage. This rage was "non-directional", had no agenda and was oriented towards sarcasm and wit. While Delhi gang rape highlights poor governance, societal problems and problems of law and order, venting out on a forum that accumulates the frustration by many such people only adds to the low well-being. It is time we use some discretion and post messages that...

Twitter vs. News - Effectiveness in building relations

Social Media has been termed as an effective way to build relationships. Brands are trying to harness this capability by building social presence on this new media. Celebrities today account for the maximum amount of followers on the web with twitter being a fine example for this. But is this new media effective in creating relationships with this vast list of followers, which celebrities often tend to have? In an interesting research by Lee and Jang , they explore the effectiveness of celebrities in building social presence on new media. They compare twitter and a news website to check the relative effectiveness of enhancing social presence. While the traditional PR machinery used by celebrities might give them news coverage, they contend that their tweets can reduce the barrier of relational development as compared to a news website. Their findings are counter-intuitive and very interesting.